In the past two decades, and in the whole period after the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement, Bosnia and Herzegovina has maintained a relatively high degree of political instability, which is why the process of democratic decision-making, coordination and harmonization hardly worked. The standard of living remained low, the positive impact of the media and NGOs is mostly absent, and the appropriate political and legal institutions are not fully constructed. In addition, the low efficiency and the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina that have been established, democratic institutions are still fragile, and ethnic homogenization is far stronger than civil.
Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.