×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review article

THE DANUBE REGION AND POSTMODERN SOCIOECONOMIC COEXISTENCE OF THE COUNTRIES OF SOUTHEAST EUROPE

By
Slobodan Nešković
Slobodan Nešković
Contact Slobodan Nešković

International Academy of Sciences, Arts and Security , Belgrade , Serbia

University Business Academy in Novi Sad FEPPS Serbia

Center for Strategic Researching and National Security – CESNA B Belgrade Serbia

St. Cyril and St. Methodius University Veliko Turnovo, Bulgaria Bulgaria

Ukrainian Technological Academy of Kiev, Ukraine Ukraine

Abstract

The Danube Region is a new geopolitical phenomenon, which is of particular importance to major political entities in a wider ambience. The area Southeast Europe is permanently burdened with traditional conflicts, but also with postmodern challenges to the existence of states. This is a modern project of the European Union in the context of achieving dominance over people and resources of the wider Black Sea - Caspian macro-region. Geographical determinants of the Danube River Basin means conglomerate authentic phenomenon and a significant cross-border co-operation in the economic development of the state. Multilateral cross-border cooperation of the Danube Region and the Balkan countries is the basic condition for progress and integration into the modern trends. Problems unresolved borders and political relations complicate the process of cooperation in the region. This can be solved by building new initiatives and institutions for the promotion of inter-state territorial cooperation, relying on agreements in the framework of European integration.

Author Contributions

Writing – review & editing, S.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.