×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Professional article

THE IMPACT OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ON THE BUSINESS PROCESSES OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES

By
Rudolf Petrušić ,
Rudolf Petrušić

International University of Travnik , Travnik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Nera Akrap
Nera Akrap

International University of Travnik , Travnik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has spread into everyday business practice faster than any digital technology before it. For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which make up around 99% of all firms in the European Union, this development matters more than most: capabilities that once required specialist staff or expensive software are now available through low-cost subscriptions. This paper reviews academic literature and industry reports published between 2017 and 2026 to examine how GenAI affects core SME business processes   marketing and sales, customer support, operations and administration, finance, and product development. The evidence so far points to the largest gains in content- and communication-heavy work; one field study, for instance, found that support agents using a GenAI assistant resolved about 15% more issues per hour. Adoption, however, is held back by skill shortages, concerns over output accuracy and data protection, and new obligations under the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. We conclude that GenAI substantially lowers the technological entry barrier for SMEs, but that capturing its value requires process redesign, employee training, and a risk-aware implementation strategy rather than tool purchases alone.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link
Issue image
Vol 14, Issue 1, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.